{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "Start with one repeated product task that has a measurable failure or cost.", "change": "Read the methods and identify one change you can isolate in that workflow.", "baseline": "Your current implementation on the same held-out tasks.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Successful outcomes, response time, human rework, and total cost per successful task.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2610.31636", "title": "Can an Agent Debug a Web Corpus? Agentic Auditing of Slovak FineWeb2", "summary": "Replaces uniform one-recipe multilingual filtering and full-corpus LLM classification passes with a single budgeted, read-only agent exploration whose findings are compiled into executable, GPU-free tests validated by a native speaker. Costs are a few dollars per agent run plus human validation time, but the approach adds pipeline complexity: findings must be confirmed by blinded human labels (one of seven findings was not supported), and the compiled tests only detect the phenomena already discovered. It can fail when the agent misses failure modes it did not sample, when static sampling would have found the same selectors more cheaply, or when defect estimates rely on small validation samples.", "rationale": "The method is cheap enough for a small team to trial on any production text corpus, but its advantage over simple static sampling is not established by the paper itself, so adoption should follow a workload-specific comparison.", "technique": "Agentic corpus auditing via budgeted tool-use", "family": "outro", "recommendation": "testar", "published": "2026-10-22", "as_of": "2026-10-23", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31636", "independent_implementations": 2, "total_implementations": 3, "stars": 132, "citations": null, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "Replaces uniform one-recipe multilingual filtering and full-corpus LLM classification passes with a single budgeted, read-only agent exploration whose findings are compiled into executable, GPU-free tests validated by a native speaker. Costs are a few dollars per agent run plus human validation time, but the approach adds pipeline complexity: findings must be confirmed by blinded human labels (one of seven findings was not supported), and the compiled tests only detect the phenomena already discovered. It can fail when the agent misses failure modes it did not sample, when static sampling would have found the same selectors more cheaply, or when defect estimates rely on small validation samples.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31636", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "Three agent runs cost $2.21-$2.84 each and compiled findings into a test suite that scans the 26.5M-document corpus in 0.7 s CPU-only, versus $12k-$90k per LLM classification pass of the same corpus (roughly a 4,200x cost reduction against the cheapest quoted alternative); however, the best static sampling baseline validated more selectors at under half the agent's cost.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31636", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }