{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "An agent looks good in demos, but you cannot tell which product tasks it fails.", "change": "Use the study's evaluation idea to inspect a small set of tasks with human-checked answers.", "baseline": "Your current evaluator and a manually reviewed reference set.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Agreement with human review, missed failures, false alarms, and evaluation cost per task.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2610.30924", "title": "REGATTA: A Cross-Domain Measurement Framework and Fault-Injection Harness for Enterprise AI Agents", "summary": "REGATTA replaces ad hoc agent test suites and unverified compliance checklists with a source-cited checklist, a 25-fault injection corpus, and a two-stage harness that scores whether suites actually detect specified faults. Cost is limited to API-based LLM generation and judging plus the effort of auditing checklist citations against binding sources, all feasible on a small team without GPUs. What can fail: the audit found most checklist items misstated rules or had defective citations, stage agreement fell below chance (.536 vs .549) on a current-model retest, and substance review was partly AI-only, so adopted suites may embed wrong reference rules.", "rationale": "The released code and fault-injection methodology directly fit an API-based engineer's agent evaluation practice, but the documented citation defects and sub-chance stage agreement mean its outputs must be validated against the reader's own workload before production trust.", "technique": "Fault-injection harness for agent test-suite evaluation", "family": "avaliacao_de_agente", "recommendation": "testar", "published": "2026-10-22", "as_of": "2026-10-24", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30924", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 1, "stars": 0, "citations": 0, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "REGATTA replaces ad hoc agent test suites and unverified compliance checklists with a source-cited checklist, a 25-fault injection corpus, and a two-stage harness that scores whether suites actually detect specified faults. Cost is limited to API-based LLM generation and judging plus the effort of auditing checklist citations against binding sources, all feasible on a small team without GPUs. What can fail: the audit found most checklist items misstated rules or had defective citations, stage agreement fell below chance (.536 vs .549) on a current-model retest, and substance review was partly AI-only, so adopted suites may embed wrong reference rules.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30924", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "Design-stage judging protocol validated by blind expert adjudication at Cohen's kappa = .72 (95% CI [.52, .88]) and 40 execution probes at kappa = .75; historical design and execution stages agree on 66-69% of fault-suite pairs.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30924", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }