{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "An agent reads external documents or tool responses that may contain malicious instructions.", "change": "Replay attacks and legitimate lookalikes in an isolated copy of your agent workflow.", "baseline": "Your existing checks with the same tasks, permissions, and tool responses.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Successful attacks missed, legitimate actions blocked, detection delay, and review cost.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2610.30690", "title": "From Clinical Judgment to Checkable Rules: Clinician-Led Guardrails for Mental-Health Chatbots", "summary": "Replaces prompt engineering, LLM-as-a-Judge, and Constitutional AI safety evaluation with a clinician-authored, formally verified four-rule base applied as a guardrail whose every verdict is recomputable from sixteen named facts. Costs: clinician time to define and adjudicate rules, a fact-extraction step, and a measured over-refusal regression where a specification revision raised block-class outcomes on held-out boundary prompts from 6.0% to 16.0%, plus an uncertainty default that can over-block. Can fail when fact extraction misidentifies content (the main source of the over-refusal regression) and when the fixed rule set misses safety failures outside its four checks, where the LLM judge may remain stronger.", "rationale": "A small verified rule base with recomputable verdicts runs cheaply on constrained infrastructure and gives auditable, localizable disagreements, making it a practical production safety layer as long as the measured over-refusal cost is acceptable for the deployment.", "technique": "Clinician-defined formally verified rule-based guardrail layer", "family": "seguranca_e_guardrails", "recommendation": "adotar", "published": "2026-10-22", "as_of": "2026-10-23", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30690", "independent_implementations": 1, "total_implementations": 2, "stars": 10, "citations": null, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "Replaces prompt engineering, LLM-as-a-Judge, and Constitutional AI safety evaluation with a clinician-authored, formally verified four-rule base applied as a guardrail whose every verdict is recomputable from sixteen named facts. Costs: clinician time to define and adjudicate rules, a fact-extraction step, and a measured over-refusal regression where a specification revision raised block-class outcomes on held-out boundary prompts from 6.0% to 16.0%, plus an uncertainty default that can over-block. Can fail when fact extraction misidentifies content (the main source of the over-refusal regression) and when the fixed rule set misses safety failures outside its four checks, where the LLM judge may remain stronger.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30690", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "The LLM judge demanded a crisis resource from 55 of 65 replies (84.6%) that already contained one; the verification layer never raises that demand by construction, though the judge produced fewer false crisis alarms on the one reference-scored check.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30690", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }