{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "A workflow needs specialist review, but extra agents may add more cost than useful work.", "change": "Test the proposed division of work against a single-agent implementation.", "baseline": "One agent with the same tools and an equal total token and time budget.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Accepted outputs, coordination failures, wall-clock time, and total cost across all agents.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2610.29934", "title": "ToM2Vec: Continuous Theory-of-Mind Tokens for Multi-Agent Coordination", "summary": "ToM2Vec replaces explicit text-based reasoning about partner states with a fixed budget of continuous latent tokens trained to abstract a partner's thoughts. It costs the complexity of a specialized training phase supervised by partner thoughts and requires managing a latent conditioning mechanism that is less inspectable than text. A failure mode is that performance degrades if this latent reasoning is forced into text, and the abstract nature of the tokens could obscure errors in the agent's model of its partners.", "rationale": "This technique requires a specialized training pipeline and evaluation framework that is likely beyond the scope of a small team with constrained infrastructure and no foundation-model training capabilities, making it a technique to monitor rather than adopt immediately.", "technique": "Latent Theory-of-Mind Tokens for Multi-Agent Coordination", "family": "orquestracao_multiagente", "recommendation": "observar", "published": "2026-10-21", "as_of": "2026-10-25", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29934", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 1, "stars": 0, "citations": 0, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "ToM2Vec replaces explicit text-based reasoning about partner states with a fixed budget of continuous latent tokens trained to abstract a partner's thoughts. It costs the complexity of a specialized training phase supervised by partner thoughts and requires managing a latent conditioning mechanism that is less inspectable than text. A failure mode is that performance degrades if this latent reasoning is forced into text, and the abstract nature of the tokens could obscure errors in the agent's model of its partners.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29934", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "The paper reports consistent improvements over the base model and a variety of competitive trained and prompted baselines across several environments, and shows that latent reasoning is critical, with performance dropping when reasoning is expressed in text. It also notes generalization to partner model families not seen at train-time and improved ability to answer questions about partner beliefs, desires, and next actions.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29934", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }