{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "Tool errors or unavailable services cause your agent to abandon recoverable tasks.", "change": "Inject repeatable tool failures and change only the recovery policy.", "baseline": "Your current retry and fallback behavior under the same injected failures.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Recovered tasks, duplicate side effects, retries, time to recovery, and total cost.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2610.27621", "title": "A Radiation-Hardened, Fault-Aware Quantized Neural Network That Self-Heals", "summary": "The method replaces extra weight replicas and classical SECDED ECC for repairing bit-flipped quantized weights, by training with a low-rank alignment penalty and reconstructing corrupted coordinates from uncorrupted ones at runtime. Its costs are a modified Fault-Aware Training procedure with an added alignment penalty, runtime projection computation during healing, and an accepted RMSE degradation of +5% to +50% depending on scrub interval. It can fail if corruption exceeds what the low-rank subspace can reconstruct from surviving coordinates, and it is validated only on six small regression benchmarks rather than production-scale models.", "rationale": "The technique targets radiation-induced bit flips in spacecraft and accelerator deployments on COTS hardware, a failure mode absent from conventional datacenter or API-based inference, so it offers no actionable benefit for the reader's constrained but terrestrial production environment.", "technique": "Projection Healing for bit-flip repair in quantized NNs", "family": "recuperacao_de_falha", "recommendation": "nao_aplica", "published": "2026-10-20", "as_of": "2026-10-21", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27621", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 1, "stars": 0, "citations": null, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "The method replaces extra weight replicas and classical SECDED ECC for repairing bit-flipped quantized weights, by training with a low-rank alignment penalty and reconstructing corrupted coordinates from uncorrupted ones at runtime. Its costs are a modified Fault-Aware Training procedure with an added alignment penalty, runtime projection computation during healing, and an accepted RMSE degradation of +5% to +50% depending on scrub interval. It can fail if corruption exceeds what the low-rank subspace can reconstruct from surviving coordinates, and it is validated only on six small regression benchmarks rather than production-scale models.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27621", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "~23% further reduction in native-unit excess integral over a fixed FAT checkpoint; extends operational scrub interval by median 2.04x at +5% RMSE degradation and 1.96x at +50%, versus 1.62x and 1.07x for SECDED.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27621", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }