{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "An assistant chooses the wrong API or sends arguments your product cannot use.", "change": "Apply the proposed tool-selection or argument-generation change in a sandbox.", "baseline": "Your current agent with the same tool schemas and task budget.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Correct completed actions, invalid calls, retries, latency, and cost per completed task.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2610.23791", "title": "DrugHarness: An Evolvable Agent Harness for Computational Drug Discovery", "summary": "DrugHarness replaces static, hand-configured scientific agent pipelines with a tool-composing harness that induces, reviews, and revises reusable skills from execution trajectories. It costs a curated environment of over 80 scientific operations and biomedical resources, an additional review agent for skill verification and targeted execution trials, plus ongoing skill-library maintenance; it does not require foundation-model training, so a single-GPU or API-based deployment is feasible for the LLM component, but the scientific tooling itself carries licensing and compute demands. It can fail through induction of spurious skills from noisy execution feedback, overfitting to benchmark-like tasks, and wet-lab validation results that do not generalize beyond the reported HPK1 case.", "rationale": "The skill-evolution pattern is a credible architectural idea worth monitoring, but the system is tied to a specialized drug-discovery environment whose benchmarks, tooling, and single prospective validation do not yet justify adoption effort for a constrained general ML team.", "technique": "Evolvable agent harness with conditional skill induction", "family": "uso_de_ferramenta", "recommendation": "observar", "published": "2026-10-16", "as_of": "2026-10-19", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23791", "independent_implementations": 1, "total_implementations": 2, "stars": 132, "citations": null, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "DrugHarness replaces static, hand-configured scientific agent pipelines with a tool-composing harness that induces, reviews, and revises reusable skills from execution trajectories. It costs a curated environment of over 80 scientific operations and biomedical resources, an additional review agent for skill verification and targeted execution trials, plus ongoing skill-library maintenance; it does not require foundation-model training, so a single-GPU or API-based deployment is feasible for the LLM component, but the scientific tooling itself carries licensing and compute demands. It can fail through induction of spurious skills from noisy execution feedback, overfitting to benchmark-like tasks, and wet-lab validation results that do not generalize beyond the reported HPK1 case.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23791", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "55% improvement in mean top-three active hits and +10.8 affinity-comparison points over MolClaw-CC on MolBench; skill evolution raises Qwen's affinity-comparison accuracy from 62.2% to 81.1% and optimization success from 79.5% to 87.2%; one synthesized compound reaches 14.19 nM cellular IC50, a 2.64-fold potency gain over the best reference.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23791", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }