{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "A support or data assistant repeats work across related customer requests.", "change": "Try the paper's memory change in a replay of past tasks, with separate memory per customer.", "baseline": "Your current memory pipeline plus a no-memory control using the same agent.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Task success, stale memories, retrieval misses, response latency, and all memory maintenance costs.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2610.11768", "title": "Narrow and Deep: An Ontology Tower as the Knowledge of an LLM Agent for an Industrial Equipment System", "summary": "It replaces broad building-automation ontologies (many entities, shallow knowledge) and passive journal search tools with a compact per-system knowledge structure containing derived physical quantities and operating lessons, injected directly as text into the agent's context. The cost is manual construction of the tower per equipment system (defining physical relations and curating journal lessons into knowledge nodes) plus prompt tokens for the projected text; no model training or extra hardware is required. It can fail when lessons are relevant but left behind a search tool (agents rarely retrieved them), when the tower is incomplete or stale relative to actual plant behavior, and when tasks require knowledge outside the encoded physical relations; results also come from a single test plant with nine tasks, so generalization is unverified.", "rationale": "The technique is cheap and API-compatible but its benefit depends on domain-specific ontology construction that the reader must validate on their own equipment and tasks.", "technique": "Narrow-and-deep ontology tower for agent knowledge", "family": "memoria_e_contexto", "recommendation": "testar", "published": "2026-10-08", "as_of": "2026-10-18", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11768", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 1, "stars": 10, "citations": null, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "It replaces broad building-automation ontologies (many entities, shallow knowledge) and passive journal search tools with a compact per-system knowledge structure containing derived physical quantities and operating lessons, injected directly as text into the agent's context. The cost is manual construction of the tower per equipment system (defining physical relations and curating journal lessons into knowledge nodes) plus prompt tokens for the projected text; no model training or extra hardware is required. It can fail when lessons are relevant but left behind a search tool (agents rarely retrieved them), when the tower is incomplete or stale relative to actual plant behavior, and when tasks require knowledge outside the encoded physical relations; results also come from a single test plant with nine tasks, so generalization is unverified.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11768", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "Injecting the ontology-tower text raised the rate of avoiding the most plausible misjudgment by about 20 percentage points across nine preregistered tasks, and raised the 9B model's overall task score to match the ~750B model; in live runs, agents reached the target band in 12 of 14 trials.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11768", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }