{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "builder_plan": {
    "scenario": "A workflow needs specialist review, but extra agents may add more cost than useful work.",
    "change": "Test the proposed division of work against a single-agent implementation.",
    "baseline": "One agent with the same tools and an equal total token and time budget.",
    "steps": [
      "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.",
      "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.",
      "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.",
      "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test."
    ],
    "measure": "Accepted outputs, coordination failures, wall-clock time, and total cost across all agents.",
    "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation."
  },
  "builder_review": null,
  "arxiv_id": "2610.11299",
  "title": "DuplexAgent-RSI: Recursive Harness Improvement for Full-Duplex Voice Agent Collaboration",
  "summary": "The method replaces hand-tuned, coupled heuristics for coordinating a full-duplex voice model with asynchronous reasoning/coding delegates by a six-module editable harness plus a closed loop (simulator, exam planner, harness editor) that revises those modules from interaction traces. Adoption costs substantial engineering: a full-duplex interaction model, a delegation pool of reasoning LLMs and coding agents, a conversation simulator, and the diagnosis/repair infrastructure, with added per-interaction latency and API spend from the improvement loop. Failure modes include the repair loop overfitting to simulator-generated conversations that misrepresent real users, incorrect failure attribution across the six modules, and regressions from automated module edits reaching production without adequate verification.",
  "rationale": "The approach addresses a real production problem but demands a simulator, duplex model access, and a self-modification pipeline that exceed a small team's constrained infrastructure and budget today, making it a pattern to monitor rather than adopt.",
  "technique": "Self-improving modular harness for duplex voice agents",
  "family": "orquestracao_multiagente",
  "recommendation": "observar",
  "published": "2026-10-08",
  "as_of": "2026-10-18",
  "editorial_status": "indexed",
  "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11299",
  "independent_implementations": 1,
  "total_implementations": 2,
  "stars": 14,
  "citations": 0,
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "claim-01",
      "statement": "The method replaces hand-tuned, coupled heuristics for coordinating a full-duplex voice model with asynchronous reasoning/coding delegates by a six-module editable harness plus a closed loop (simulator, exam planner, harness editor) that revises those modules from interaction traces. Adoption costs substantial engineering: a full-duplex interaction model, a delegation pool of reasoning LLMs and coding agents, a conversation simulator, and the diagnosis/repair infrastructure, with added per-interaction latency and API spend from the improvement loop. Failure modes include the repair loop overfitting to simulator-generated conversations that misrepresent real users, incorrect failure attribution across the six modules, and regressions from automated module edits reaching production without adequate verification.",
      "basis": "inferred",
      "result": "",
      "baseline": "",
      "conditions": "",
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11299",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "claim-02",
      "statement": "The paper reports stronger spoken-knowledge and executable-tool benchmark scores than compared delegated systems while maintaining strong interruption response, but the abstract provides no quantified figures.",
      "basis": "inferred",
      "result": "",
      "baseline": "",
      "conditions": "",
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11299",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    }
  ],
  "exposure_map": [
    {
      "dimension": "quality",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "compute",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "latency",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "operations",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "compatibility",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "security",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "data_and_training",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "reproducibility",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    }
  ],
  "risks": [],
  "minimum_test": [],
  "open_questions": [],
  "independent_tests": [],
  "lab_reproductions": [],
  "report_available": false,
  "validation_tier": "unknown",
  "evidence_tier": "unknown",
  "infrastructure_basis": "unknown",
  "equations": [],
  "equations_status": "not_fetched",
  "core_kind": "",
  "equations_fetched_at": "",
  "equations_source_url": "",
  "equations_source_sha256": "",
  "exposures_reviewed_at": "",
  "exposures_source_sha256": ""
}