{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "builder_plan": {
    "scenario": "You already need task-specific training and want to reduce its memory or compute cost.",
    "change": "Change only the training technique on a small controlled run after checking prerequisites.",
    "baseline": "Your current training recipe with the same model, data split, and evaluation.",
    "steps": [
      "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.",
      "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.",
      "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.",
      "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test."
    ],
    "measure": "Held-out quality, peak memory, training time, and full compute cost to the target quality.",
    "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation."
  },
  "builder_review": null,
  "arxiv_id": "2609.35614",
  "title": "EvE: An Alternate Optimizer to Adam",
  "summary": "EvE replaces Adam as the trial-evaluation optimizer inside hyperparameter and architecture search, using a population-of-four differential evolution step with gradient descent invoked only as a fallback, at per-iteration cost within a constant factor of one Adam step. The cost is final model quality: roughly one accuracy point on MNIST and 9-11% higher relative test loss on the two LoRA fine-tuning tasks, so it is not a final-stage trainer. It can fail when search-phase rankings do not transfer to full Adam training, and on GSM8K fine-tuning reduced accuracy below the base model for both optimizers, indicating task regimes where the proxy signal is unreliable.",
  "rationale": "The method targets exactly the reader's budget-constrained search regime and runs on a single GPU, but the documented quality gap and ranking-transfer risk mean it should be validated on the reader's own workloads before replacing Adam in their search loop.",
  "technique": "EvE: differential-evolution optimizer with targeted Adam fallback",
  "family": "treino_eficiente",
  "recommendation": "testar",
  "published": "2026-09-28",
  "as_of": "2026-10-18",
  "editorial_status": "indexed",
  "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35614",
  "independent_implementations": 0,
  "total_implementations": 0,
  "stars": 0,
  "citations": null,
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "claim-01",
      "statement": "EvE replaces Adam as the trial-evaluation optimizer inside hyperparameter and architecture search, using a population-of-four differential evolution step with gradient descent invoked only as a fallback, at per-iteration cost within a constant factor of one Adam step. The cost is final model quality: roughly one accuracy point on MNIST and 9-11% higher relative test loss on the two LoRA fine-tuning tasks, so it is not a final-stage trainer. It can fail when search-phase rankings do not transfer to full Adam training, and on GSM8K fine-tuning reduced accuracy below the base model for both optimizers, indicating task regimes where the proxy signal is unreliable.",
      "basis": "inferred",
      "result": "",
      "baseline": "",
      "conditions": "",
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35614",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "claim-02",
      "statement": "Under an evaluation-cost-matched budget, EvE wins or ties Adam on 76% of 70 benchmark cells; on three neural-network tasks it finishes the same charged budget 1.7-3.9x faster, and inside successive halving on UCI Adult it completes hyperparameter/architecture searches 3.1-3.5x faster with Kendall's tau 0.66-0.69 configuration-ranking agreement versus Adam.",
      "basis": "inferred",
      "result": "",
      "baseline": "",
      "conditions": "",
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35614",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    }
  ],
  "exposure_map": [
    {
      "dimension": "quality",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "compute",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "latency",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "operations",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "compatibility",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "security",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "data_and_training",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "reproducibility",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    }
  ],
  "risks": [],
  "minimum_test": [],
  "open_questions": [],
  "independent_tests": [],
  "lab_reproductions": [],
  "report_available": false,
  "validation_tier": "unknown",
  "evidence_tier": "unknown",
  "infrastructure_basis": "unknown",
  "equations": [],
  "equations_status": "not_fetched",
  "core_kind": "",
  "equations_fetched_at": "",
  "equations_source_url": "",
  "equations_source_sha256": "",
  "exposures_reviewed_at": "",
  "exposures_source_sha256": ""
}