{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "builder_plan": {
    "scenario": "Your coding assistant makes changes that still need substantial repair before merging.",
    "change": "Try the technique on held-out issues from a repository with reliable tests.",
    "baseline": "The same coding agent, repository snapshot, tools, and token budget.",
    "steps": [
      "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.",
      "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.",
      "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.",
      "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test."
    ],
    "measure": "Correct patches, regression failures, human repair time, and total cost per accepted change.",
    "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation."
  },
  "builder_review": null,
  "arxiv_id": "2609.35530",
  "title": "AutoRef: Harness Optimization for Agentic Multi-Reference Image Generation",
  "summary": "The method replaces hand-written orchestration harnesses (reference processing, generation, diagnosis, and selection logic) with harness code iteratively rewritten by a coding agent while the generator and reasoning models stay frozen. The cost is a one-time search budget of coding-agent and generation API calls plus added inference-time complexity from the harness's diagnosis and selection loop; the discovered harness itself runs on a single 24 GB GPU with a 4B open-weight model. Failure modes include overfitting the harness to the search-time evaluator or task distribution, regression when the production workload diverges from the reported transfer conditions, and silent quality variance because gains are measured by an automated evaluator rather than human judgment.",
  "rationale": "The reader can reuse the published harness on an open 4B model within a single 24 GB GPU, but should validate quality and evaluator alignment on their own reference-generation workload before production adoption.",
  "technique": "Automated harness optimization for multi-reference image generation",
  "family": "agentes_de_codigo",
  "recommendation": "testar",
  "published": "2026-09-28",
  "as_of": "2026-10-18",
  "editorial_status": "indexed",
  "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35530",
  "independent_implementations": 1,
  "total_implementations": 3,
  "stars": 32,
  "citations": null,
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "claim-01",
      "statement": "The method replaces hand-written orchestration harnesses (reference processing, generation, diagnosis, and selection logic) with harness code iteratively rewritten by a coding agent while the generator and reasoning models stay frozen. The cost is a one-time search budget of coding-agent and generation API calls plus added inference-time complexity from the harness's diagnosis and selection loop; the discovered harness itself runs on a single 24 GB GPU with a 4B open-weight model. Failure modes include overfitting the harness to the search-time evaluator or task distribution, regression when the production workload diverges from the reported transfer conditions, and silent quality variance because gains are measured by an automated evaluator rather than human judgment.",
      "basis": "inferred",
      "result": "",
      "baseline": "",
      "conditions": "",
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35530",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "claim-02",
      "statement": "Improves FLUX.2 [klein] 4B from 5.72 to 7.37 on held-out four-reference MultiBanana tasks, reportedly matching or exceeding Nano Banana Pro and GPT-Image-1.5; the same harness transfers without re-optimization across generators, reference counts, benchmarks, evaluators, and reasoning models.",
      "basis": "inferred",
      "result": "",
      "baseline": "",
      "conditions": "",
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35530",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    }
  ],
  "exposure_map": [
    {
      "dimension": "quality",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "compute",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "latency",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "operations",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "compatibility",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "security",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "data_and_training",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "dimension": "reproducibility",
      "basis": "not_evaluated",
      "finding": "",
      "interpretation": "",
      "limitation": "",
      "next_check": "",
      "source_url": "",
      "source_page": null,
      "source_excerpt": ""
    }
  ],
  "risks": [],
  "minimum_test": [],
  "open_questions": [],
  "independent_tests": [],
  "lab_reproductions": [],
  "report_available": false,
  "validation_tier": "unknown",
  "evidence_tier": "unknown",
  "infrastructure_basis": "unknown",
  "equations": [],
  "equations_status": "not_fetched",
  "core_kind": "",
  "equations_fetched_at": "",
  "equations_source_url": "",
  "equations_source_sha256": "",
  "exposures_reviewed_at": "",
  "exposures_source_sha256": ""
}