{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "A self-hosted model uses more compute or memory than your workload can justify.", "change": "Check for a usable pruned checkpoint and runtime support before attempting model surgery.", "baseline": "The original unpruned model at the same precision, context, and load.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Task quality, actual GPU memory, serving throughput, and preparation cost.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2609.29029", "title": "Exploiting answer-invariant redundancies in satellite imagery for efficient VLM inference on edge", "summary": "Rift replaces exhaustive tiled inference over high-resolution satellite imagery with two-stage pruning: query-conditioned removal of irrelevant image tiles followed by elastic prefill to shrink the vision token budget. The cost is an additional pruning stage whose tile and token selection must itself run on the edge device, plus implementation complexity beyond a standard VLM pipeline. It can fail when the query-conditioned pruner discards tiles that actually contain the answer, since answer-invariance is estimated rather than guaranteed, and the reported gains are specific to one model, one benchmark, and one satellite edge platform.", "rationale": "The token-pruning principle is directly applicable to document and image understanding workloads on a single 24 GB GPU, but the claimed accuracy improvement and edge-specific numbers require validation on the reader's own data before production adoption.", "technique": "Query-conditioned tile and token pruning for VLM inference", "family": "esparsidade_e_poda", "recommendation": "testar", "published": "2026-09-24", "as_of": "2026-10-18", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29029", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 0, "stars": 0, "citations": 0, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "Rift replaces exhaustive tiled inference over high-resolution satellite imagery with two-stage pruning: query-conditioned removal of irrelevant image tiles followed by elastic prefill to shrink the vision token budget. The cost is an additional pruning stage whose tile and token selection must itself run on the edge device, plus implementation complexity beyond a standard VLM pipeline. It can fail when the query-conditioned pruner discards tiles that actually contain the answer, since answer-invariance is estimated rather than guaranteed, and the reported gains are specific to one model, one benchmark, and one satellite edge platform.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29029", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "On LLaVA-1.5 7B on Jetson AGX Orin, Rift reduces energy by 78% and latency by 69% versus exhaustive tiled inference, while raising accuracy from 45% to 73%.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29029", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }