{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "Long customer conversations exhaust memory or limit concurrent requests.", "change": "Change only the attention cache policy, after checking model and runtime support.", "baseline": "The same model with its ordinary attention cache.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Peak cache memory, long-context answer quality, first-token latency, and requests completed.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2609.27981", "title": "Risk-Controlled KV-Cache Eviction: From Memory Budgets to Risk Targets", "summary": "The method replaces ad hoc eviction-budget tuning (choosing a retention level from average quality-memory curves) with a post-hoc, compressor-agnostic certification procedure that picks a retention policy from calibration data under a finite-sample risk guarantee, falling back to full KV when nothing certifies. It costs calibration data drawn from the target workload, an extra utility evaluation against full-KV inference, and potentially large memory headroom: on some workloads no eviction at all is certified, so the safety guarantee can erase the memory savings. It can fail when calibration data is unrepresentative of production traffic, when the utility metric mismeasures task quality, or when the finite-sample correction rejects policies that are actually acceptable, leaving the system at costly full KV.", "rationale": "The certification layer is cheap to implement on a single GPU and workload-specific, but its value depends on whether the reader's deployment actually supports any certified eviction level, which must be validated on their own calibration data.", "technique": "Risk-controlled KV-cache eviction certification", "family": "cache_kv", "recommendation": "testar", "published": "2026-09-23", "as_of": "2026-10-18", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27981", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 0, "stars": 0, "citations": 0, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "The method replaces ad hoc eviction-budget tuning (choosing a retention level from average quality-memory curves) with a post-hoc, compressor-agnostic certification procedure that picks a retention policy from calibration data under a finite-sample risk guarantee, falling back to full KV when nothing certifies. It costs calibration data drawn from the target workload, an extra utility evaluation against full-KV inference, and potentially large memory headroom: on some workloads no eviction at all is certified, so the safety guarantee can erase the memory savings. It can fail when calibration data is unrepresentative of production traffic, when the utility metric mismeasures task quality, or when the finite-sample correction rejects policies that are actually acceptable, leaving the system at costly full KV.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27981", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "On Llama/LongBench, certification selects policies retaining 5-10 percentage points less cache than uncertified empirical choices at a 5% degradation-risk target; on Llama/RULER-32K no compressed policy is certified and full KV is required.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27981", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }