{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "Start with one repeated product task that has a measurable failure or cost.", "change": "Read the methods and identify one change you can isolate in that workflow.", "baseline": "Your current implementation on the same held-out tasks.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Successful outcomes, response time, human rework, and total cost per successful task.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2609.20761", "title": "Agile-WAM: An Agile Tactile World Action Model for Contact-Rich Robot Control", "summary": "Agile-WAM replaces large pretrained generative backbones in tactile world action models with a compact shared-latent architecture that directly flow-matches vision-tactile observations to action chunks and future latents, using multi-horizon supervision tuned to each modality's timescale. The cost is a full perception-to-control training pipeline requiring synchronized visual and tactile robot data, plus contact-rich hardware (tactile sensors, manipulators) that is not part of a typical 24 GB GPU or API-based stack. Failure modes include sim-to-real transfer gaps on the nine simulated tasks, tactile sensor drift or noise degrading the fine-grained contact prediction, and brittleness outside the demonstrated task distribution.", "rationale": "The method targets contact-rich robot manipulation requiring physical hardware and tactile data collection, which falls outside the reader's production decision space of language-model inference, agents, and retrieval on constrained GPU/API infrastructure.", "technique": "Agile tactile world action model via flow matching", "family": "outro", "recommendation": "nao_aplica", "published": "2026-09-17", "as_of": "2026-10-18", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20761", "independent_implementations": 2, "total_implementations": 3, "stars": 108, "citations": 0, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "Agile-WAM replaces large pretrained generative backbones in tactile world action models with a compact shared-latent architecture that directly flow-matches vision-tactile observations to action chunks and future latents, using multi-horizon supervision tuned to each modality's timescale. The cost is a full perception-to-control training pipeline requiring synchronized visual and tactile robot data, plus contact-rich hardware (tactile sensors, manipulators) that is not part of a typical 24 GB GPU or API-based stack. Failure modes include sim-to-real transfer gaps on the nine simulated tasks, tactile sensor drift or noise degrading the fine-grained contact prediction, and brittleness outside the demonstrated task distribution.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20761", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "29.4% relative gain in overall success rate over the strongest baseline across five real-world contact-rich tasks, with 11.9 ms inference latency", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20761", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }