{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "A product assistant retrieves plausible documents but gives unsupported answers.", "change": "Change one retrieval or ranking step while keeping the document snapshot fixed.", "baseline": "Your current retrieval pipeline with identical questions and answer model.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Supported answers, retrieval misses, correct abstentions, index cost, and response latency.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2609.18445", "title": "M-SQE: Multilingual Skill Quality Estimation for Enhancing Language Equality in Agentic Skill Use", "summary": "M-SQE replaces relevance-only ranking of retrieved agent skills with a post-retrieval scoring stage that combines an intrinsic-quality Theory view and a task-grounded Action view into a domain-conditioned score. It costs an additional scoring pass per retrieved candidate, increasing latency and LLM/API call volume, and requires maintaining a candidate skill pool and the scoring prompts or models. It can fail when the quality estimator misjudges synthesized in-language skills, when domains outside the three evaluated ones do not fit the conditioning, or when the underlying skill library lacks any viable candidate to resurface.", "rationale": "The method is implementable on constrained infrastructure as a reranking layer over existing retrieval, but its gains are demonstrated only on the paper's constructed skill pools and three domains, so it requires validation on the reader's own skill library and languages before adoption.", "technique": "Post-retrieval multilingual skill quality estimation", "family": "recuperacao_e_rag", "recommendation": "testar", "published": "2026-09-16", "as_of": "2026-10-18", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18445", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 1, "stars": 1, "citations": 0, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "M-SQE replaces relevance-only ranking of retrieved agent skills with a post-retrieval scoring stage that combines an intrinsic-quality Theory view and a task-grounded Action view into a domain-conditioned score. It costs an additional scoring pass per retrieved candidate, increasing latency and LLM/API call volume, and requires maintaining a candidate skill pool and the scoring prompts or models. It can fail when the quality estimator misjudges synthesized in-language skills, when domains outside the three evaluated ones do not fit the conditioning, or when the underlying skill library lacks any viable candidate to resurface.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18445", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "Task success exceeds the best baseline's average by at least +3.5 points across three retrievers, with +12.9 points on Hindi and +5.6 points on Swahili in low-resource settings.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18445", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "not_fetched", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }