{ "schema_version": 1, "builder_plan": { "scenario": "Start with one repeated product task that has a measurable failure or cost.", "change": "Read the methods and identify one change you can isolate in that workflow.", "baseline": "Your current implementation on the same held-out tasks.", "steps": [ "Locate the paper's implementation and check its license, model support, data needs, and hardware requirements. Stop here if you cannot obtain the required artifacts.", "Save a small set of representative product tasks and expected outcomes. Keep evaluation tasks out of any training or tuning, and choose quality and cost limits before running.", "Run the baseline and the proposed change on identical inputs. Keep other settings fixed and repeat paired runs to expose variation.", "Save per-task outputs, failures, timings, and all usage costs. Review regressions before expanding the test." ], "measure": "Successful outcomes, response time, human rework, and total cost per successful task.", "decision": "Keep the change only if it meets your preselected quality and latency limits and improves the metric you care about after setup and operating costs. Otherwise retain the baseline. This is an exploration plan, not a validated recommendation." }, "builder_review": null, "arxiv_id": "2609.17171", "title": "A unified framework for global and local interpretability using adaptive derivative-ordered random explanation", "summary": "ADORE replaces separate LIME/SHAP-style local explanations and global feature-importance analyses with a single derivative-based framework that uses first- and second-order derivatives, randomized SVD, and dynamic sparsity detection. It costs integration effort into existing explanation pipelines, requires differentiable model access or reliable derivative approximations, and adds implementation complexity relative to mature libraries like SHAP, though an open-source package is available. It can fail if the target model's gradients are unavailable or noisy (e.g., black-box APIs or non-smooth tree ensembles), if the claimed efficiency gains do not hold at the reader's data scale, or if explanations prove unstable under the randomized decomposition.", "rationale": "The method is directly runnable on constrained infrastructure as a post-hoc Python package, but its advantages over established tools like SHAP are unquantified in the abstract and depend on gradient access, so small-scale workload-specific validation is warranted before production adoption.", "technique": "Derivative-based unified post-hoc model explanation (ADORE)", "family": "outro", "recommendation": "testar", "published": "2026-09-15", "as_of": "2026-10-18", "editorial_status": "indexed", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17171", "independent_implementations": 0, "total_implementations": 0, "stars": 0, "citations": 0, "claims": [ { "claim_id": "claim-01", "statement": "ADORE replaces separate LIME/SHAP-style local explanations and global feature-importance analyses with a single derivative-based framework that uses first- and second-order derivatives, randomized SVD, and dynamic sparsity detection. It costs integration effort into existing explanation pipelines, requires differentiable model access or reliable derivative approximations, and adds implementation complexity relative to mature libraries like SHAP, though an open-source package is available. It can fail if the target model's gradients are unavailable or noisy (e.g., black-box APIs or non-smooth tree ensembles), if the claimed efficiency gains do not hold at the reader's data scale, or if explanations prove unstable under the randomized decomposition.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17171", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "claim_id": "claim-02", "statement": "The authors report that ADORE outperforms LIME and SHAP in capturing nonlinear feature interactions and in computational efficiency across tabular, text, and image data, but the abstract provides no quantitative factor; claims must be verified against the full paper's tables.", "basis": "inferred", "result": "", "baseline": "", "conditions": "", "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17171", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "exposure_map": [ { "dimension": "quality", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compute", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "latency", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "operations", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "compatibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "security", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "data_and_training", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" }, { "dimension": "reproducibility", "basis": "not_evaluated", "finding": "", "interpretation": "", "limitation": "", "next_check": "", "source_url": "", "source_page": null, "source_excerpt": "" } ], "risks": [], "minimum_test": [], "open_questions": [], "independent_tests": [], "lab_reproductions": [], "report_available": false, "validation_tier": "unknown", "evidence_tier": "unknown", "infrastructure_basis": "unknown", "equations": [], "equations_status": "unavailable", "core_kind": "", "equations_fetched_at": "2026-10-18", "equations_source_url": "", "equations_source_sha256": "", "exposures_reviewed_at": "", "exposures_source_sha256": "" }